Prevalence and predictors of right ventricular dysfunction among adults living with HIV in northwest Nigeria
Highlight box
Key findings
• Right ventricular (RV) dysfunction as assessed by right ventricular myocardial perfusion index is common among adult Nigerians with the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV).
• RV dysfunction was associated with participant age and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) but not with antiretroviral therapy (ART) use or death.
What is known and what is new?
• The prevalence and association of RV dysfunction with ART and mortality in persons with HIV have been largely understudied.
• RV dysfunction is common in people with HIV and associated with age and LVEF.
• The association between RV dysfunction and LVEF among people living with HIV is modified by ART status.
What is the implication, and what should change now?
• The findings from this study could help inform future directions for improved therapeutic management of patients with HIV and cardiac dysfunction.
Introduction
Background
People living with the human immunodeficiency virus (PLWH) are at increased risk of cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) (1-3), such as human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-associated cardiomyopathy, pulmonary hypertension, and congestive heart failure. This increased risk is attributed to reduced mortality and improved survival in PLWH due to the progress made in the availability and access to effective antiretroviral therapies. Several pathogenetic mechanisms have been proposed as the basis for the spectrum of CVDs seen in HIV. These include systemic chronic inflammation/ immune activation from the HIV virus itself, concomitant viral infections (e.g., Cytomegalovirus), exposure to endemic pathogens (e.g., Mycobacterium tuberculosis, parasitic infestations), myocarditis from secondary opportunistic infections, micronutrient deficiencies, autonomic dysfunction, tobacco and/or alcohol use, and exposure to specific antiretroviral medications, such as protease inhibitors (4).
Rationale and knowledge gap
Right ventricular (RV) function estimated via echocardiography or radionuclide ventriculography is an important prognostic indicator in ischemic heart disease and dilated cardiomyopathy (5). Despite the prognostic utility and potential therapeutic target of RV dysfunction in many CVDs, its prevalence, predictors, and association with antiretroviral therapy (ART) and mortality have been largely understudied, especially in Nigeria. Earlier studies (6,7), some conducted in the pre-ART era, have attempted to determine the prevalence and presence of subclinical RV dysfunction in PLWH. However, it remains unclear whether there are ART-based differences in the occurrence of RV dysfunction and whether RV dysfunction impacts adverse clinical outcomes in HIV, specifically mortality and rehospitalization rates. In addition, previous studies in PLWH mostly focused on left ventricular (LV) function (8-11), and only a few reports focused on RV dysfunction in Nigeria (12). For decades, the RV has been thought to have limited significant value in cardiac function. The introduction of the Fontan procedure for complex congenital heart disease in 1968, a technique that directly connects the right atrium to the pulmonary artery, thus ‘bypassing’ the RV, reinforced this belief (13). As a result, the role of the RV in heart failure and other disease states has been largely understudied (14).
Objective
We propose to assess the prevalence of RV dysfunction in the resource-constrained and high HIV burden setting of northwest Nigeria using multiparameter variables, and to explore its association with duration of HIV disease and type of ART regimen. Our work has the potential of advancing our understanding of the pathophysiology of RV dysfunction among PLWH in Nigeria and informing future directions for improved therapeutic management of patients with HIV and cardiac dysfunction. We present this article in accordance with the STROBE reporting checklist (available at https://cdt.amegroups.com/article/view/10.21037/cdt-24-165/rc).
Methods
Study design and setting
This is a retrospective cross-sectional study with participants drawn from adult patients attending the HIV clinic at Aminu Kano Teaching Hospital (AKTH), a public tertiary health facility located in Kano, northwest Nigeria. Kano is the most populous state in Nigeria and has an estimated HIV prevalence of 1.3% (15). The HIV clinic at AKTH is supported by the U.S. President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR) and provides care for more than 10,000 PLWH. The clinic is also a site for multiple ongoing clinical research studies funded by the U.S. National Institutes of Health (NIH).
Participants
We recruited 220 adult PLWH (18–65 years) from the HIV clinic at AKTH. One half of these adults (n=110) were ART-naïve, while the other half (n=110) were ART-experienced. An age- and sex-matched group of HIV-negative participants (n=110) was recruited from the AKTH general medical outpatient clinic, giving a final sample size of 330 participants. Matching was done using the optimal pair matching ratio of 2:1 (PLWH: controls respectively). Most participants self-referred after receiving information from printed flyers distributed during clinic visits. The ART-naïve participants were mostly referrals from other health facilities (private and public) that lack the capacity to care for PLWH.
We estimated that a minimum sample of 220 PLWH will allow us detect an estimated RV dysfunction prevalence of 16% (±5%) among PLWH (based on a range of 11–20% reported in prior studies) (15) with a confidence level of 95% and assuming a non-response rate of 5%. We assume that RV dysfunction prevalence among HIV-negative persons will be at least half of the prevalence in PLWH, resulting in an estimated minimum sample size of 110 HIV-negative persons.
We excluded persons with the following conditions: history of opportunistic infection within the past three months (using the medical records of the participants and thorough examination), current pregnancy, history of hypertension or on treatment for hypertension, history of diabetes mellitus, not willing to consent, and history of cancer/malignancy. Other exclusion criteria include history of illicit drug use and use of medications with potential for cardiotoxicity (e.g., anthracyclines, 5-fluorouracil, cyclophosphamide, etc.). Individuals with these conditions were excluded due to the potential of these conditions to confound the association between HIV status and right heart function.
Procedures
Eligible and consented participants were consecutively recruited using convenience sampling over a period of six months (February to August 2023). Participants in the control group were enrolled similarly but were recruited from the general outpatient department of the same hospital. Enrolled participants underwent a history and physical examination with emphasis on the cardiovascular and respiratory systems, in addition to a review of clinical records. Basic demographic information such as age, sex, ethnicity, cigarette smoking, and family history of CVD and diabetes mellitus were collected using a structured questionnaire. In addition to the thorough physical examination, control group participants also underwent HIV testing. Data on clinical indices including log viral load, current ART regimen, and duration on ART were extracted from the HIV-positive participants’ medical records (Figure 1).
Cardiac measurements
Transthoracic echocardiography and 12 lead electrocardiography (ECG) were performed on all participants by an experienced cardiologist with formal training in cardiac imaging using the General Electric (GE) Vivid iq series machine with the 3.5-MHz transducer probe and Schiller AT-2 ECG machine, respectively. Standard Motion-mode (M-mode), two-dimensional (2D), pulse wave (PW), continuous wave (CW), and color Doppler echocardiography were conducted with the patient in the left lateral decubitus position with appropriate adjustments of gain settings, filters, and pulse repetition frequency (PRF) to optimize color saturation.
Right heart measurements
We diagnosed RV dysfunction using multiparameter echocardiographic variables, specifically: tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE); right ventricular fractional area change (RVFAC); right ventricular peak systolic velocity (RV S’); right ventricular myocardial performance index (RVMPI) or Tei Index, and trans-tricuspid valve pulsed wave Doppler interrogation.
The TAPSE was recorded from the apical four-chamber view with the M-mode cursor placed through the lateral tricuspid annulus and the absolute systolic displacement of the annulus measured from peak to trough. Abnormal TAPSE was defined as a value <16 mm (Figure 2) (16). The RV area in both diastole and systole was obtained from the apical four-chamber view by planimetry and RVFAC calculated using the formula below:
Abnormal RVFAC was defined as RVFAC <35% (Figures 3,4) (16). RVMPI was determined using tissue Doppler-derived isovolumic (TDI) contraction time, isovolumic relaxation time, and RV ejection time (Figure 5). Abnormal RVMPI was defined as >0.55 (16). The pulsed Doppler RV S’ at peak lateral annular contraction was determined by tissue Doppler method and abnormal RV S’ defined as <10 cm/s (Figure 6) (16). From the apical four-chamber view, a 5-mm PW sample volume was placed just apical to the lateral tricuspid valve annulus for the TDI with the RV free wall to obtain a Doppler angulation of close to zero degrees between the interrogating Doppler beam and the longitudinal motion of the RV free wall. The pulmonary artery systolic pressure (PASP) was determined using the modified Bernoulli equation (16). Pulmonary hypertension was defined as mean pulmonary arterial pressure (mPAP) >20 mmHg (17). All other measurements were performed according to the American Society of Echocardiography (ASE) guidelines (16).
Left heart measurements
The left atrial size and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) were determined using the left atrial volume index (LAVI) and Simpson’s biplane disk summation method. The global longitudinal strain (GLS) of both ventricles was assessed to detect subclinical systolic dysfunction. The left atrial volume (LAV) was measured using the modified biplane area-length method and then corrected for body surface to derive the LAVI (18). The LAVI was categorized as either normal (<28 mL/m2) or increased (mild 29–33 mL/m2; moderate 34–39 mL/m2; severe ≥40 mL/m2) (18). The LVEF was determined using the Simpson’s biplane disk summation method, where good 2D apical two-chamber (A2CH) and four-chamber (A4CH) views were obtained and care was taken to avoid apical foreshortening (Figure 7). Manual tracing of the endocardial border avoiding the papillary muscles was performed in both end-diastole and end-systole, from the lateral to septal borders of the annulus on the 4-chamber view and the anterior and inferior annular borders on the 2-chamber view. End-diastole was defined as the onset of the QRS complex and end-systole was defined as the end of the T-wave (18).
The GLS of the ventricles was assessed by two-dimensional speckle tracking echocardiography (2D-STE) with the automated function imaging (AFI) software of the vivid iq machine. All images were recorded at a frame rate of 58 cycles/second. The speckles were tracked on the standard grayscale 2D images. Myocardial strain was then calculated by measuring the change of the position of the speckles within the myocardial segment or region of interest during the cardiac cycle. The GLS assessment of the RV was performed using a good RV-focused apical four-chamber view by tracing the endocardial surface of the RV in the apical 4-chamber with a 3-point-and-click approach (Figure 8) (19). Care was taken to avoid RV trabeculations. Abnormal RV GLS was defined as −17 and below (19). The GLS of the LV was estimated using the apical two-, three-, and four-chamber views of the LV. A peak systolic longitudinal strain of greater than −18% was accepted as normal) (19).
The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki (as revised in 2013) and the International Conference on Harmonization for Good Clinical Practice (ICH-GCP) (20) guidelines. Ethical approval for the study was obtained from the AKTH Ethics Review Committee and the Vanderbilt University Medical Center (NHREC/28/01/2020/AKTH/EC/3494, AKTH/MAC/SUB/12A/P-3/VI/3594 and IRB-200119). Eligible participants were approached regarding potential participation in the study, and written informed consent was obtained from all individual participants.
Statistical analysis
We described baseline descriptive statistics for continuous variables using the median ± interquartile range (IQR), as well as percentages and frequencies for categorical variables. The prevalence of echocardiographic abnormalities was determined using simple proportions; 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated with Wilson intervals. Differences between the prevalence of RV dysfunction were tested using Chi-square tests. Differences in function based on the continuous RV measure were assessed using the Wilcoxon rank-sum test. Multiple linear regression modeling was performed to assess for independent predictors of RVMPI as a continuous variable, as it serves as a comprehensive marker for both systolic and diastolic functions of the RV. One model was fit among all participants; a second model was fit among HIV-positive participants and a third with interaction term to evaluate the combined effect of ART status and LVEF. The models included variables deemed clinically meaningful in these analyses: age, sex, LVEF, HIV status (for model with all participants), and ART status (for model among HIV-positive participants). Firth’s logistic regression models were fit to investigate predictors of RV dysfunction based on dichotomized RVMPI. R software was used for all computations, and a two-sided P value <0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Results
General clinical characteristics
From February 2023 to August 2023, we sought consent from 240 adults living with HIV who did not have a history of traditional risk factors for CVD and attended the AKTH HIV clinic, along with 115 healthy individuals at the general outpatient clinic. Of the 355 individuals approached, a total of 330 subjects (93%) agreed to participate in the study and provided consent. Among these 330 participants, 220 were PLWH (110 ART-experienced and 110 ART-naïve), and 110 were healthy individuals. The majority of the participants (98%) were urban dwellers residing in Kano.
Women comprised 61% (n=200) of the study population. The overall median age was 45 (IQR, 38–52) years, higher in the control group than in the ART-experienced and ART-naïve arms [48 (IQR, 40–55) vs. 43 (IQR, 35–50) vs. 42 (IQR, 38–50), respectively, P=0.002] (Table 1).
Table 1
Characteristics | Overall (N=330) | Control (N=110) | HIV+, ART-naïve (N=110) | HIV+, on ART (N=110) | P value |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Age (years) | 45 (38, 52) | 48 (40, 55) | 43 (35, 50) | 42 (38, 50) | 0.002* |
Sex | 0.02* | ||||
Female | 200 (61%) | 59 (54%) | 63 (57%) | 78 (71%) | |
Marital status | <0.001* | ||||
Divorced | 22 (6.7%) | 3 (2.7%) | 7 (6.4%) | 12 (11%) | |
Married | 232 (70%) | 97 (88%) | 70 (64%) | 65 (59%) | |
Single | 29 (8.8%) | 1 (0.9%) | 7 (6.4%) | 21 (19%) | |
Widowed | 47 (14%) | 9 (8.2%) | 26 (24%) | 12 (11%) | |
Education | <0.001* | ||||
Missing/unknown | 2 (0.6%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 2 (1.8%) | |
None/informal education | 70 (21%) | 22 (20%) | 28 (25%) | 20 (18%) | |
Primary | 57 (17%) | 27 (25%) | 30 (27%) | 0 (0%) | |
Secondary | 137 (42%) | 43 (39%) | 38 (35%) | 56 (51%) | |
Tertiary | 64 (19%) | 18 (16%) | 14 (13%) | 32 (29%) | |
Occupation | <0.001* | ||||
Business | 111 (34%) | 46 (42%) | 35 (32%) | 30 (27%) | |
Civil servant | 71 (22%) | 21 (19%) | 17 (15%) | 33 (30%) | |
Pensioner | 23 (7.0%) | 13 (12%) | 10 (9.1%) | 0 (0%) | |
Unemployed | 85 (26%) | 21 (19%) | 25 (23%) | 39 (35%) | |
Missing | 40 (12%) | 9 (8.2%) | 23 (21%) | 8 (7.3%) | |
Place of residence | 0.008* | ||||
Rural | 18 (5.5%) | 5 (4.5%) | 3 (2.7%) | 10 (9.1%) | |
Semi-urban | 22 (6.7%) | 7 (6.4%) | 14 (12.7%) | 1 (0.9%) | |
Urban | 290 (88%) | 98 (89%) | 93 (85%) | 99 (90%) | |
Body surface area (m2) | 1.68 (1.58, 1.79) | 1.75 (1.67, 1.86) | 1.61 (1.51, 1.70) | 1.67 (1.56, 1.79) | <0.001* |
Body mass index (kg/m2) | 24.2 (21.0, 27.8) | 27.0 (24.3, 29.4) | 21.4 (18.6, 24.1) | 24.1 (21.1, 28.4) | <0.001* |
Systolic blood pressure (mmHg) | 120 (110, 128) | 120 (115, 128) | 113 (100, 123) | 120 (110, 130) | <0.001* |
Diastolic blood pressure (mmHg) | 71 (68, 80) | 70 (70, 76) | 70 (64, 80) | 79 (70, 82) | <0.001* |
Data are presented as median (interquartile range) and n (%). *, significant P value. HIV, human immunodeficiency virus; ART, antiretroviral therapy.
The control group had a higher median body mass index (BMI) [27.0 (IQR, 24.3–29.4) vs. 21.4 (IQR, 18.6–24.1) kg/m2 for ART-naïve and 24.1 (IQR, 21.1–28.4) kg/m2 for HIV-positive ART experienced participants, P<0.001]. The median systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) were higher in the PLWH-ART experienced group than in the PLWH-ART naïve group and controls [SBP: 120 (IQR, 110–130) vs. 113 (IQR, 100–123) mmHg and 120 (IQR, 115–128) mmHg, P<0.001; DBP: 79 (IQR, 70–82) vs. 70 (IQR, 64–80) vs. 70 (IQR, 70–76) mmHg, P<0.001; respectively]. There were no differences in baseline pulse rate between the three groups.
Baseline 12-lead electrocardiographic findings
The electrocardiographic parameters of study participants are shown in Table 2. The QTc, PR intervals and QRS duration were similar across the three groups. However, the presence of left atrial enlargement (LAE) and voltage criteria for left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) were observed in only one patient each in the HIV-ART naïve group (P>0.99). There were more patients in the HIV ART-naïve group with tachycardia compared to the other cohorts, and a higher proportion of patients in the HIV ART-experienced group exhibited bradycardia (5.5%, P=0.03).
Table 2
Characteristics | Overall (N=330) | Control (N=110) | HIV+, ART-naïve (N=110) | HIV+, on ART (N=110) | P value |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
PR (bpm) | 84 (76, 92) | 86 (78, 92) | 86 (76, 92) | 80 (72, 93) | 0.11 |
LVEF (%) | 66 (61, 70) | 66 (60, 69) | 66 (62, 70) | 66 (60, 71) | 0.40 |
LVEF (<55%) abnormal | 16 (4.8%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 16 (15%) | <0.001* |
LAVI (>28 mL/m2) | 13 (3.9%) | 0 (0%) | 1 (0.9%) | 12 (11%) | <0.001* |
LVIDd (>5.5 cm) | 27 (8.2%) | 2 (1.8%) | 3 (2.7%) | 22 (20%) | <0.001* |
LVIDs (>4.0 cm) | 13 (3.9%) | 0 (0%) | 2 (1.8%) | 11 (10%) | <0.001* |
LV mass (g), abnormal (>162 in females and >224 in males) | 14 (4.2%) | 1 (0.9%) | 2 (1.8%) | 11 (10%) | 0.003* |
LVMI (g/m2), abnormal (≥115 in males and ≥95 in females) | 28 (8.5%) | 2 (1.8%) | 4 (3.6%) | 22 (20%) | <0.001* |
TAPSE (>1.6 cm) | 5 (1.5%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 5 (4.5%) | 0.01* |
RV basal (>4.2 cm) | 13 (3.9%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 13 (12%) | <0.001* |
RAAs (>18 cm2) | 4 (1.2%) | 2 (1.8%) | 2 (1.8%) | 0 (0%) | 0.60 |
RV S’ (<0.10 m/s) | 1 (0.3%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 1 (0.9%) | >0.90 |
RVMPI | 0.4 (0.3, 0.5) | 0.3 (0.3, 0.4) | 0.4 (0.4, 0.5) | 0.4 (0.4, 0.5) | <0.001* |
RVMPI (>0.55) | 32 (9.7%) | 0 (0%) | 16 (15%) | 16 (15%) | <0.001* |
RVFAC (<35%) | 26 (7.9%) | 8 (7.3%) | 4 (3.6%) | 14 (13%) | 0.04* |
TR peak velocity (>2.8 m/s) | 5 (1.5%) | 1 (0.9%) | 0 (0%) | 4 (3.6%) | 0.13 |
MPAP (>20 mmHg) | 10 (3.0%) | 1 (0.9%) | 0 (0%) | 9 (8.2%) | <0.001* |
RV GLS (>−17%) | 7 (2.1%) | 1 (0.9%) | 1 (0.9%) | 5 (4.5%) | 0.20 |
LV GLS (>−18%) | 13 (3.9%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 13 (12%) | <0.001* |
PASP: abnormal (>30 mmHg) | 8 (2.4%) | 1 (0.9%) | 0 (0%) | 7 (6.4%) | 0.007* |
LAE | >0.99 | ||||
Normal (<2.5 mV) | 329 (100%) | 110 (100%) | 109 (99%) | 110 (100%) | |
Present (≥2.5 mV) | 1 (0.3%) | 0 (0%) | 1 (0.9%) | 0 (0%) | |
LVH | >0.99 | ||||
Present (≥35 mm) | 1 (0.3%) | 0 (0%) | 1 (0.9%) | 0 (0%) | |
Voltage criteria for LVH (≥35 mm) | 1 (0.3%) | 1 (0.9%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | |
T wave inversion | 0.04* | ||||
Normal | 323 (98%) | 110 (100%) | 106 (96%) | 107 (97%) | |
v1–v3 | 1 (0.3%) | 0 (0%) | 1 (0.9%) | 0 (0%) | |
v1–v4 | 2 (0.6%) | 0 (0%) | 2 (1.8%) | 0 (0%) | |
v1–v5 | 2 (0.6%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 2 (1.8%) | |
v1–v6 | 1 (0.3%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 1 (0.9%) | |
v3–v6 | 1 (0.3%) | 0 (0%) | 1 (0.9%) | 0 (0%) | |
QTc interval (>440 ms) | 8 (2.4%) | 1 (0.9%) | 3 (2.7%) | 4 (3.6%) | 0.50 |
PR interval | 0.80 | ||||
Shortened (<120 ms) | 6 (1.8%) | 1 (0.9%) | 3 (2.7%) | 2 (1.8%) | |
Prolonged (>200 ms) | 9 (2.7%) | 3 (2.7%) | 4 (3.6%) | 2 (1.8%) | |
QRS duration (>120 ms) | 1 (0.3%) | 0 (0%) | 1 (0.9%) | 0 (0%) | >0.90 |
HR | 0.03* | ||||
Bradycardia (<60 bpm) | 10 (3.0%) | 3 (2.7%) | 1 (0.9%) | 6 (5.5%) | |
Tachycardia (>100 bpm) | 26 (7.9%) | 6 (5.5%) | 15 (14%) | 5 (4.5%) | |
TV E/A ratio | <0.001* | ||||
Grade 1 | 38 (12%) | 7 (6.4%) | 9 (8.2%) | 22 (20%) | |
Grade 2 | 285 (86%) | 103 (94%) | 101 (92%) | 81 (74%) | |
Grade 3 | 7 (2.1%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 7 (6.4%) | |
E wave DT (ms), abnormal | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) |
Data are presented as median (interquartile range) and n (%). *, significant P value. HIV, human immunodeficiency virus; ART, antiretroviral therapy; PR, pulse rate; LVEF, left ventricular ejection fraction; LAVI, left atrial volume index; LVIDd, left ventricular internal diameter in diastole; LVIDs, left ventricular internal diameter in systole; LV mass, left ventricular mass; LVMI, left ventricular mass index; TAPSE, tricuspid valve trans-annular plane systolic excursion; RV basal, right ventricular basal diameter; RAAs, right atrial area in systole; RV S’, right ventricular peak systolic pressure; RVMPI, right ventricular myocardial performance index; RVFAC, right ventricular fractional area change; TR peak velocity, tricuspid regurgitant jet peak velocity; MPAP, mean pulmonary artery pressure; RV GLS, right ventricular global longitudinal strain; PASP, pulmonary artery systolic pressure; LAE, left atrial enlargement; LVH, left ventricular hypertrophy; HR, heart rate; TV E/A ratio, tricuspid valve early to atrial contraction ratio; E wave DT, E wave deceleration time.
Baseline echocardiographic findings
The proportion of participants with LVEF lower than 55% was significantly higher among ART-experienced HIV-positive subjects compared to ART-naïve participants and controls (15% vs. 0% and 0%) respectively (Table 2). The LAVI was also significantly higher in the PLWH-ART experienced cohort (11%) than in the PLWH-ART naïve and controls (0.9% and 0%, respectively). Other metrics such as left ventricular internal dimension in diastole and in systole (LVIDd, LVIDs), LV mass, and left ventricular mass index (LVMI) were all significantly higher in the HIV ART-experienced group compared to the HIV ART-naïve and control groups (Table 2).
The HIV ART-experienced group showed higher values for RV basal diameter (RV basal, 12%) and mean pulmonary artery pressure (MPAP, 8.2%) than the other two groups (P<0.001 in both instances). Only 4 participants (3.6%) in the HIV ART-experienced group had TR peak velocity >2.8 m/s, which was not significantly different from the other groups (P=0.13). Whereas a higher proportion of subjects in the HIV ART-experienced group showed abnormal RV GLS compared to the HIV-positive ART-naïve group and normal controls, this difference was not statistically significant (4.5% vs. 0.9% vs. 0.9%, respectively; P=0.20).
Prevalence of RV dysfunction among HIV-positive and HIV-negative groups
RV systolic and diastolic dysfunction, as determined by the RV myocardial performance index (RVMPI) was more prevalent among HIV-positive participants compared to HIV-negative individuals [prevalence =14.50% (95% CI: 10.5–19.8%) for HIV-positive vs. 0% (95% CI: 0.0–3.4%) for HIV-negative controls; P<0.001]. The median RVMPI for the HIV-positive group was also higher than the value for HIV-negative participants at 0.43 (IQR, 0.36–0.49) vs. 0.3 (IQR, 0.30–0.40), P<0.001 (Table 3).
Table 3
Variable | Prevalence, %, (95% CI) | Median (IQR) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HIV+ | HIV− | P value | HIV+ | HIV− | P value | ||
RVMPI | 14.50 (10.5–19.8) | 0.00 (0.0–3.4) | <0.001* | 0.43 (0.36–0.49) | 0.3 (0.30–0.40) | <0.001* | |
RVFAC (%) | 7.70 (4.9–12.0) | 7.27 (3.7–13.6) | 0.88 | 48.6 (43.00–54.80) | 43.0 (38.00–49.00) | <0.001* | |
RV S’ (m/s) | 0.50 (0.02–2.50) | 0.90 (0.04–5.00) | >0.99 | 0.13 (0.12–0.14) | 0.14 (0.12–0.15) | <0.001* | |
TAPSE (cm) | 2.30 (1.00–5.20) | 2.70 (0.90–7.70) | >0.99 | 2.20 (2.00–2.40) | 2.10 (1.90–2.40) | 0.09 |
*, significant P value. HIV, human immunodeficiency virus; CI, confidence interval; IQR, interquartile range; RVMPI, right ventricular myocardial performance index; RVFAC, right ventricular fractional area change; RV S’, right ventricular peak systolic pressure; TAPSE, tricuspid valve trans-annular plane systolic excursion.
The prevalence of RV systolic dysfunction, as measured by the RVFAC was similar between HIV-positive and HIV-negative groups [prevalence =7.70% (95% CI: 4.9–12.0%) vs. 7.27% (95% CI: 3.7–13.6%) respectively, P=0.88]. However, the median RVFAC for PLWH was higher than in those without HIV: 48.6 (IQR, 43.00–54.80) vs. 43.0 (IQR, 38.00–49.00), respectively (P<0.001) (Table 3).
RV systolic dysfunction, as determined by the RV S’ was low among participants who were HIV-negative [prevalence =0.90% (95% CI: 0.04–5.00%)] and among those who were HIV-positive [0.50% (95% CI: 0.02–2.50%); P>0.99]. The median RV S’ for persons with HIV was 0.13 (IQR, 0.12–0.14) compared to 0.14 (IQR, 0.12–0.15) for people without HIV (P<0.001). RV systolic dysfunction, as assessed by the TAPSE was also similarly prevalent among participants with HIV compared to seronegative controls, [prevalence =2.30% (95% CI: 1.00–5.20%) vs. 2.70% (95% CI: 0.90–7.70%), respectively; P>0.99] (Table 3).
Association between markers of RV dysfunction (RVMPI, RVFAC, RV S’, TAPSE) and ART use
HIV+ participants on ART had a longer duration of HIV illness than those who were ART-naïve [10 (IQR, 7–13) vs. 0.25 (IQR, 0.17–0.33) years, respectively, P<0.001] (Table 4). The average viral load in participants on ART was 20 (IQR, 20–35) cells/mL (Table 4). Approximately 92.5% (99/107) of participants on ART were on a tenofovir-based regimen.
Table 4
Variable | Prevalence, % (95% CI) | Median (IQR) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ART-naïve | ART+ | P value | ART-naïve | ART+ | P value | ||
RVMPI | 14.5 (9.2–22.3) | 14.5 (9.2–22.3) | >0.99 | 0.43 (0.36–0.50) | 0.42 (0.36–0.47) | 0.71 | |
RVFAC (%) | 3.6 (1.4–8.9) | 11.8 (7.0–19.2) | 0.04* | 47.2 (42.2–52.1) | 52.1 (44.5–56.4) | 0.003* | |
RV S’ (m/s) | 0 (0–3.4) | 0.9 (0.04–5.0) | >0.99 | 0.13 (0.12–0.14) | 0.13 (0.12–0.14) | 0.89 | |
TAPSE (cm) | 0 (0–3.4) | 4.5 (2.0–10.2) | 0.06 | 2.2 (2.03–2.40) | 2.1 (2.0–2.40) | 0.43 | |
Duration of HIV (years) | – | – | – | 0.25 (0.17–0.33) | 10 (7–13) | <0.001 | |
Duration of ART use (years) | 10 (7–13) | ||||||
Viral load (cells/mL) | – | – | – | – | 20 (20–35) | – |
*, significant P value. ART, antiretroviral therapy; CI, confidence interval; IQR, interquartile range; RVMPI, right ventricular myocardial performance index; RVFAC, right ventricular fractional area change; RV S’, right ventricular peak systolic pressure; TAPSE, tricuspid valve trans-annular plane systolic excursion; HIV, human immunodeficiency virus.
The prevalence of RV dysfunction as measured by RV fractional area change (RVFAC) was greater among HIV-positive participants on ART as compared to their HIV-positive ART-naïve counterparts [11.8% (95% CI: 7.0–19.2%) vs. 3.6% (95% CI: 1.4–8.9%), P=0.04] (Table 4). The median RVFAC was similarly higher among HIV-positive ART-experienced participants [52.1 (IQR, 44.5–56.4) vs. 47.2 (IQR, 42.2–52.1, P=0.003] (Table 4). There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups in the prevalence of RV dysfunction as measured by the other markers or in the average values of the other three markers of RV dysfunction (RVMPI, RV S’ and TAPSE).
In initial analyses among people living with HIV that investigated factors associated with RVMPI (as a continuous variable), we found that older age and lower LVEF are good predictors of higher RVMPI (Table 5). In a multiple linear regression model among people with HIV including age, sex, LVEF, and ART-status, age (P=0.01) and LVEF (P<0.001) were associated with RVMPI (Table 5). A 10-year increase in age was associated with a 0.022 unit increase in RVMPI (95% CI: 0.005–0.039). A 10% increase in LVEF was associated with a 0.076 unit decrease in RVMPI (95% CI: −0.09, −0.06). However, we failed to demonstrate a statistically significant association between ART status and RV dysfunction using both multivariable linear and Firth’s logistic regression models (Table 5). Controlling for ART status, sex, and LVEF, a 10-year increase in age was associated with an 81% increase in the odds of RV dysfunction [odds ratio (OR) 1.81; 95% CI: 1.16–2.84]. A 10% increase in LVEF was associated with a 61% decrease in the odds of RVMPI (OR 0.39, 95% CI: 0.26–0.58) (Table 5).
Table 5
Variable | Linear regression | Firth’s logistic regression | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
β coef. (95% CI) | P value | OR (95% CI) | P value | ||
Age (per 10 years) | 0.022 (0.005, 0.039) | 0.01* | 1.81 (1.16, 2.84) | 0.008* | |
Male vs. female (ref.) | −0.001 (−0.037, 0.035) | 0.94 | 0.68 (0.27, 1.67) | 0.39 | |
ART+vs. ART-naïve (ref.) | −0.000 (−0.034, 0.034) | >0.99 | 0.40 (0.15, 1.02) | 0.051 | |
LVEF (per 10%) | −0.076 (−0.09, −0.06) | <0.001* | 0.39 (0.26, 0.58) | <0.001* |
*, significant P value. RVMPI, right ventricular myocardial performance index; RV, right ventricular; HIV-positive, human immunodeficiency virus; CI, confidence interval; OR, odds ratio; ART, antiretroviral therapy; LVEF, left ventricular ejection fraction.
However, we saw a statistically significant interaction between LVEF and ART status (P=0.03; Table 6). Specifically, for people who were ART-experienced, a 10% increase in LVEF was associated with a 0.08 decrease in RVMPI (beta coefficient =−0.08, 95% CI: −1.10 to −0.07), whereas for those who were ART naïve, a 10% increase in LVEF was associated with a 0.03 decrease in RVMPI (beta coefficient =−0.03, 95% CI: −0.08 to 0.01) (Table 6). Results were similar when models were fit separately to ART-experienced and ART-naïve participants (Table S1) and when LVEF was included as a categorical variable (normal vs. abnormal) and interacted with ART status (Tables S2-S4). In analyses that categorized RVMPI as normal/abnormal, the interaction was not statistically significant (P=0.72).
Table 6
Variable | Linear regression | |
---|---|---|
β coef. (95% CI) | P value | |
Age (per 10 years) | 0.021 (0.004, 0.038) | 0.01* |
Male vs. female (ref.) | −0.003 (−0.038, 0.032) | 0.86 |
ART+vs. ART-naïve (ref) (LVEF set at median of 66%) | −0.001 (−0.035, 0.032) | 0.93 |
Interaction of ART status and LVEF | – | 0.03* |
LVEF (per 10%) among ART-naïve | −0.03 (−0.08, 0.01) | 0.14 |
LVEF (per 10%) among ART+ | −0.08 (−0.10, −0.07) | <0.001* |
*, significant P value. RVMPI, right ventricular myocardial performance index; RV, right ventricular; HIV-positive, human immunodeficiency virus; LVEF, left ventricular ejection fraction; ART, antiretroviral therapy; CI, confidence interval.
Association between HIV status and RV dysfunction
Table 7 shows the results of regression analyses examining factors associated with RVMPI and RV dysfunction as defined by dichotomized RVMPI. In a multiple linear regression model, HIV status (P<0.001) and LVEF (P<0.001) were associated with RVMPI. After adjusting for age, sex, and LVEF, participants with HIV had, on average, RVMPI scores that were 0.105 units higher than those without HIV (95% CI: 0.078, 0.132). A 10% increase in LVEF was associated with a 0.06 decrease in RVMPI (95% CI: −0.07, −0.05). With RVMPI dichotomized as RV dysfunction (yes/no), in a model adjusting for HIV status, sex, age, and LVEF, a 10-year increase in age was associated with a 79% increase in the odds of RV dysfunction (OR 1.79; 95% CI: 1.14–2.81). The odds of RV dysfunction for people with HIV was 42 times higher than that for people without HIV (OR 42.3, 95% CI: 2.68–6.70). A 10% increase in LVEF was associated with a 55% decrease in the odds of RV dysfunction (OR 0.45, 95% CI: 0.32–0.64).
Table 7
Variable | Linear regression | Firth’s logistic regression | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
β coef. (95% CI) | P value | OR (95% CI) | P value | ||
Age (per 10 years) | 0.010 (−0.002, 0.020) | 0.09 | 1.79 (1.14, 2.81) | 0.01* | |
Male sex vs. female (ref.) | 0.002 (−0.024, 0.027) | 0.89 | 0.78 (0.32, 1.91) | 0.06 | |
HIV+vs. HIV− (ref.) | 0.105 (0.078, 0.132) | <0.001* | 42.3 (2.68, 6.70) | <0.001* | |
LVEF (per 10%) | −0.06 (−0.07, −0.05) | <0.001* | 0.45 (0.32, 0.64) | <0.001* |
*, significant P value. RVMPI, right ventricular myocardial performance index; RV, right ventricular; CI, confidence interval; OR, odds ratio; HIV, human immunodeficiency virus; LVEF, left ventricular ejection fraction.
Relationship of RV GLS, PASP and RV dysfunction
Among the HIV on ART group, a total of 5 participants had poor strain and 105 had preserved strain (Table 8). When stratified by subclinical RV function as defined by RV GLS of greater than −17, the difference in estimated PASP was statistically significant (P=0.002). Similarly, RV strain varied significantly by RVFAC (P<0.001), MPAP (P<0.001) and RVMPI (P=0.001). However, when stratified by TAPSE (P=0.20) and RV S’ (P>0.99), no statistically significant differences in RV strain were observed.
Table 8
Characteristics | Overall (N=110) | Preserved RV strain (N=105) | Poor RV strain (N=5) | P value† |
---|---|---|---|---|
RVFAC (%) | <0.001* | |||
Abnormal (<35) | 14 (13%) | 9 (8.6%) | 5 (100%) | |
Normal (≥35) | 96 (87%) | 96 (91.4%) | 0 (0%) | |
RV S’ (m/s) | >0.99 | |||
Abnormal (<0.10) | 1 (0.9%) | 1 (1.0%) | 0 (0%) | |
Normal (≥0.10) | 109 (99.1%) | 104 (99%) | 5 (100%) | |
TAPSE (cm) | 0.20 | |||
Abnormal (<1.6) | 5 (4.5%) | 4 (3.8%) | 1 (20%) | |
Normal (≥1.6) | 105 (95.5%) | 101 (96.2%) | 4 (80%) | |
RVMPI | 0.001* | |||
Abnormal (>0.55) | 16 (15%) | 12 (11%) | 4 (80%) | |
Normal (≤0.55) | 94 (85%) | 93 (89%) | 1 (20%) | |
PASP (mmHg) | 0.002* | |||
Abnormal (≥30) | 7 (6.4%) | 4 (3.8%) | 3 (60%) | |
Normal (<30) | 103 (93.6%) | 101 (96.2%) | 2 (40%) | |
MPAP (mmHg) | <0.001* | |||
Abnormal (>20) | 9 (8.1%) | 5 (4.8%) | 4 (80%) | |
Normal (≤20) | 101 (91.8%) | 100 (95.2%) | 1 (20%) |
†, Fisher’s exact test. *, significant P value. RV, right ventricular; GLS, global longitudinal strain; RVFAC, right ventricular fractional area change; RV S’, right ventricular peak systolic pressure; TAPSE, tricuspid valve trans-annular plane systolic excursion; RVMPI, right ventricular myocardial performance index; PASP, pulmonary artery systolic pressure; MPAP, mean pulmonary artery pressure.
Discussion
Key findings
To our knowledge, this is the first study to use multiple echocardiographic parameters including GLS, to define RV dysfunction and to determine LVEF and left atrial size using Simpson’s biplane disk method and LAVI respectively, among PLWH in Nigeria. We found a higher prevalence of RV dysfunction among PLWH compared to seronegative controls. Even though HIV positive status and LVEF were associated with abnormal RVMPI (a measure of both RV diastolic and systolic function), we did not observe an association between ART status and RV dysfunction.
PLWH face double the risk of developing CVDs, even with viral suppression, use of ART and the absence of major atherosclerotic CVD risks (21). RV function estimated at echocardiography or radionuclide ventriculography is an important prognostic indicator in ischemic heart disease and dilated cardiomyopathy (5). Nevertheless, the relationship between ART regimens and RV dysfunction remains largely understudied, as is the prevalence of RV dysfunction in HIV, despite its clinical importance in the prognosis of many CVDs (5).
Comparison with similar research studies
The importance of the RV has been underestimated in the past, as previous HIV-related studies have primarily focused on LV function (8-10). In our study, we found that RV diastolic and systolic dysfunction as measured by RVMPI, was present in 14.5% of our HIV-positive participants, significantly higher than in our seronegative subjects. This finding aligns with a previous study that showed significantly impaired RVMPI in the HIV-positive group (13%) compared to healthy controls (22).
The prevalence of RV systolic dysfunction in PLWH as determined by RVFAC, RV S’ and TAPSE in this study was 7.7%, 0.5%, and 2.3% respectively, which did not significantly differ from the normal controls. The prevalence of RV dysfunction (using RVFAC alone) in our study is lower than a report from the United States (11%) (23). Our TAPSE-derived figures are also lower than the numbers (7.0%) reported in a Nigerian study (12). These differences could stem from the different criteria used to define RV dysfunction. We used standardized cut-off values of abnormal TAPSE of <1.6 cm as recommended by the ASE guidelines (16), which have been shown to correlate well with radionuclide angiographically determined right ventricular ejection fraction (RVEF) (24). In contrast, the U.S. study used a TAPSE of <2.2 cm, defined by the lower quartile in the cohort, whereas the Nigerian study used the same criteria definition of abnormal TAPSE and RV S’ but only included PLWH naïve to ART. In a similar study in South-South Nigeria, mean TAPSE was found to be similar between PLWH (both ART experienced and ART naïve) and normal controls (25).
The RV myocardial performance index (RVMPI) also called the Tei index, defines both systolic and diastolic functions of the RV. Using the RVMPI as the continuous response variable, we identified HIV status (P<0.0001) and LVEF (P<0.0001) as independent risk factors for RV dysfunction. Our finding contrasts with a previous study that showed only pulmonary infections as the primary predictor of RV dilatation and isolated RV heart failure (26). Another study failed to demonstrate associations between age, sex, dyslipidemia, CD4+ cell count and mPAP and the outcome of RV dysfunction (27). Possible reasons for these differences include varied covariates used, the different markers used to define the outcome variables (we used RVMPI) and varied eligibility criteria (we excluded individuals with recent pulmonary infection in our study).
After controlling for age, LVEF, and sex, PLWH in our study had an RVMPI that was 0.105 units higher than seronegative controls (95% CI: 0.07–0.13). Consistent with our study, Hammoudi et al. (22) also reported impaired RVMPI in PLWH compared to healthy seronegative controls. Various pathologic mechanisms have been advanced to explain the myocardial involvement that could underlie isolated RV dysfunction in HIV, including repeated opportunistic infections, direct viral and drug toxicity, genetic susceptibility, altered autoimmune responses and autonomic dysfunction (2,3,28,29).
Our finding that LVEF independently predicted RV dysfunction (P<0.0001) is consistent with established knowledge that LV is a known cause of RV dysfunction (30). Pulmonary hypertension is also associated with HIV infection (23,31) and can result in RV dysfunction. Exaggerated ventricular interdependence and left heart dysfunction-related pulmonary hypertension could therefore explain our finding. Among the PLWH on ART in our study sixteen (15%) had LVEF <50%, 7 (6.4%) had abnormal PASP >35 mmHg, and 4 (3.6%) had abnormal TR peak velocity >2.8 m/s. In addition, abnormal RV GLS (which could indicate subclinical RV dysfunction) was present in 5 participants in the HIV ART-experienced cohort. This contrasts with the HIV-negative control group, where only 1 participant had abnormal PASP, abnormal TR peak velocity, or abnormal RV GLS, and there were no cases of LVEF <50%. However, not all of our participants with elevated TR peak velocity and PASP had RV dysfunction, and vice versa, suggesting that HIV has distinct effects on pulmonary hemodynamics and RV myocardial function, and indicating likely separate pathologic pathways for primary RV dysfunction and pulmonary hypertension.
Certain classes of antiretroviral drugs are known to be associated with myocardial dysfunction. For instance, Zidovudine, Stavudine and the protease inhibitors can cause myocardial mitochondrial toxicity and coronary artery disease, respectively (32). We failed to find a statistically significant association between ART status and the prevalence of RV dysfunction as measured by RVMPI, TAPSE and RV S’. Our results are in agreement with Robbertse et al., who showed that compared to normal controls, PLWH on ART (tenofovir/lamivudine/dolutegravir) nine months after initiation did not exhibit changes in right and left cardiac parameters (chamber volumes, dimensions and systolic function) as determined by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) (33). This consistency in findings is reassuring given that CMR is considered the gold standard for evaluating the right heart more so than 2D-echocardiography.
The link between age and RV dysfunction is not surprising. Age-dependent cellular, structural, and functional changes in the heart are well-recognized. In one study (34), RVMPI was directly correlated with increasing participant age in both ventricles.
RV dysfunction is a negative prognostic factor in many CVDs, exacerbating heart failure, and posing a significant risk for sudden cardiac death (SCD) (35). In our HIV ART-experienced group, six participants died, but none of them exhibited RV dysfunction based on the markers we assessed. We therefore did not find evidence supporting our hypothesis that RV dysfunction is directly associated with death. However, our study’s short-term follow-up of three to six months and its design are not suitable for determining long-term survival outcomes. In addition, the study was not powered for this purpose.
2D-STE offers several advantages over other strain imaging abnormalities like tissue Doppler imaging. Its sample volume angle independence and integration of artificial intelligence software for automated tracking coupled with the ability to detect early subclinical myocardial dysfunction make it particularly valuable. In this study, using 2D-STE, a frame rate of 58, and a RV GLS of less than −17 to define worse strain, we found statistically significant associations between RV GLS and RVFAC, RVMPI and PASP among participants in the ART-experienced group. In contrast to our study where no association was observed between RV GLS and TAPSE, a 2011 study found TAPSE to be lower in patients with decreased RV longitudinal mid wall strain below the median value of −27.3% (23). This difference with our findings could be explained by the variation in the wall segment used, frame rate and the cut-off value.
Strengths and limitations
Our study has several strengths. To our knowledge, this is the first large cross-sectional study of RV dysfunction among PLWH from a high HIV-burden setting of Nigeria classified by ART status and using multiple echocardiographic parameters, including RVMPI (a measure of both RV diastolic and systolic function). In addition, we employed 2D-STE to evaluate GLS, which has advantages over other methods for assessing strain imaging abnormalities. Transthoracic echocardiography and 12 lead ECG were also performed on all participants by an experienced cardiologist, increasing the validity of study findings. The study is also timely because of its potential of generating preliminary data that could be further tested with larger prospective studies.
A limitation of our study is the cross-sectional design, which limits causal inferences. Second, caution is warranted when interpreting the prevalence data due to the limited sample size and the non-random selection of cases and controls. Third, AKTH is the main referral tertiary hospital in the state—patients presenting there for care may differ in socioeconomic status and educational attainment from those seen in smaller facilities. We also excluded participants with current pregnancy, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, history of cancer/malignancy, illicit drug use and use of potentially cardiotoxic medications. This selection of participants from a single clinic and the relatively broad exclusion criteria potentially limits the generalizability of our findings. Finally, assessing measures of RV dysfunction in asymptomatic individuals remains of uncertain significance and warrants further study. We also did not power the study to detect differences in death outcomes and did not utilize advanced diagnostic techniques like CMR and right heart catheterization, which could provide more accurate measurements.
Conclusions
We found a high prevalence of RV dysfunction (14.5%) using the RVMPI among a group of HIV-positive, ART-experienced patients in Nigeria. In addition, we identified participants’ age and LVEF as significant predictors of RV dysfunction using RVMPI, and no association between RV dysfunction and ART use and death. The findings from this study could inform future directions for improved therapeutic management of patients with HIV and cardiac dysfunction, such as the use of cardiac remodeling drugs, particularly in resource-constrained, high-HIV burden settings. They also highlight the complexity of RV dysfunction in PLWH, warranting further investigations into its underlying mechanisms and clinical implications. In light of our findings, we recommend considering baseline echocardiography for PLWH who are older than 45 years.
Acknowledgments
We appreciate VBRCH program secretarial support provided by Mr. Bilya Musa and Ms. Chelsea Van Wyk.
Funding: This study was supported by
Footnote
Reporting Checklist: The authors have completed the STROBE reporting checklist. Available at https://cdt.amegroups.com/article/view/10.21037/cdt-24-165/rc
Data Sharing Statement: Available at https://cdt.amegroups.com/article/view/10.21037/cdt-24-165/dss
Peer Review File: Available at https://cdt.amegroups.com/article/view/10.21037/cdt-24-165/prf
Conflicts of Interest: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form (available at https://cdt.amegroups.com/article/view/10.21037/cdt-24-165/coif). The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.
Ethical Statement: The authors are accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved. The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki (as revised in 2013) and the International Conference on Harmonization for Good clinical Practice (ICH-GCP) guidelines. Ethical approval for the study was obtained from the AKTH Ethics Review Committee and the Vanderbilt University Medical Center (NHREC/28/01/2020/AKTH/EC/3494, AKTH/MAC/SUB/12A/P-3/VI/3594 and IRB/200119). Eligible participants were approached regarding potential participation in the study, and written informed consent was obtained from all individual participants.
Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.
References
- Currie PF, Jacob AJ, Foreman AR, et al. Heart muscle disease related to HIV infection: prognostic implications. BMJ 1994;309:1605-7. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Speich R, Jenni R, Opravil M, et al. Primary pulmonary hypertension in HIV infection. Chest 1991;100:1268-71. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Almodovar S, Cicalini S, Petrosillo N, et al. Pulmonary hypertension associated with HIV infection: pulmonary vascular disease: the global perspective. Chest 2010;137:6S-12S. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Remick J, Georgiopoulou V, Marti C, et al. Heart failure in patients with human immunodeficiency virus infection: epidemiology, pathophysiology, treatment, and future research. Circulation 2014;129:1781-9. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Ghio S, Recusani F, Klersy C, et al. Prognostic usefulness of the tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion in patients with congestive heart failure secondary to idiopathic or ischemic dilated cardiomyopathy. Am J Cardiol 2000;85:837-42. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Dellegrottaglie S, García-Alvarez A, Guarini P, et al. Prevalence and severity of ventricular dysfunction in patients with HIV-related pulmonary arterial hypertension. Heart Lung 2014;43:256-61. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- d'Arminio Monforte A, Sabin CA, Phillips A, et al. The changing incidence of AIDS events in patients receiving highly active antiretroviral therapy. Arch Intern Med 2005;165:416-23. Erratum in: Arch Intern Med 2005;165:1200. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Isasti G, Pérez I, Moreno T, et al. Echocardiographic abnormalities and associated factors in a cohort of asymptomatic HIV-infected patients. AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses 2013;29:20-4. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Hsue PY, Hunt PW, Ho JE, et al. Impact of HIV infection on diastolic function and left ventricular mass. Circ Heart Fail 2010;3:132-9. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Longo-Mbenza B, Seghers LV, Vita EK, et al. Assessment of ventricular diastolic function in AIDS patients from Congo: a Doppler echocardiographic study. Heart 1998;80:184-9. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Uwanuruochi K, Onwubere B, Anisiuba B. Echocardiographic study of left ventricular function in HIV-infected Nigerians. West African J Radiol 2015;22:27-31. [Crossref]
- Effiong B, Ansa V, Andy J, et al. Right ventricular function in treatment-naïve human immunodeficiency virus-infected patients. Cardiovasc J Afr 2023; Epub ahead of print. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Fontan F, Baudet E. Surgical repair of tricuspid atresia. Thorax 1971;26:240-8. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Apostolakis S, Konstantinides S. The right ventricle in health and disease: insights into physiology, pathophysiology and diagnostic management. Cardiology 2012;121:263-73. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Onovo AA, Adeyemi A, Onime D, et al. Estimation of HIV prevalence and burden in Nigeria: a Bayesian predictive modelling study. EClinicalMedicine 2023;62:102098. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Rudski LG, Lai WW, Afilalo J, et al. Guidelines for the echocardiographic assessment of the right heart in adults: a report from the American Society of Echocardiography endorsed by the European Association of Echocardiography, a registered branch of the European Society of Cardiology, and the Canadian Society of Echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2010;23:685-713; quiz 786-8. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Humbert M, Kovacs G, Hoeper MM, et al. 2022 ESC/ERS Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of pulmonary hypertension. Eur Heart J 2022;43:3618-731. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Lang RM, Bierig M, Devereux RB, et al. Recommendations for chamber quantification: a report from the American Society of Echocardiography's Guidelines and Standards Committee and the Chamber Quantification Writing Group, developed in conjunction with the European Association of Echocardiography, a branch of the European Society of Cardiology. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2005;18:1440-63. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Voigt JU, Pedrizzetti G, Lysyansky P, et al. Definitions for a common standard for 2D speckle tracking echocardiography: consensus document of the EACVI/ASE/Industry Task Force to standardize deformation imaging. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 2015;16:1-11. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- FDA Protection of Human Subjects, 21 C.F.R. $ 50.3 (2004). Public Welfare General Requirements for Informed Consent, 45 C.F.R. $ 46.116 (2003). International Conference on Harmonization, Guidance for Good Clinical Practice. Available online: https://www.ecfr.gov?current/title-45/part-46/section-46.116
- Shah ASV, Stelzle D, Lee KK, et al. Global Burden of Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease in People Living With HIV: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Circulation 2018;138:1100-12. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Hammoudi N, Ederhy S, Di Angelantonio E, et al. Right ventricular Tei Index obtained by tissue Doppler imaging is impaired in patients with Human immunodeficiency virus. Eur J Echocardiogr 2006;7:S141. [Crossref]
- Simon MA, Lacomis CD, George MP, et al. Isolated right ventricular dysfunction in patients with human immunodeficiency virus. J Card Fail 2014;20:414-21. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Speiser U, Hirschberger M, Pilz G, et al. Tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion assessed using MRI for semi-quantification of right ventricular ejection fraction. Br J Radiol 2012;85:e716-21. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Oluwabunmi AA, Rumokere AM, Sotonye DM. Pattern of Electrocardiographic and Echocardiographic Abnormalities Among HIV Patients in Port Harcourt, Nigeria. International Journal of HIV/AIDS Prevention, Education and Behavioural Science 2020. doi:
10.11648/j.ijhpebs.20200601.13 10.11648/j.ijhpebs.20200601.13 - Silva-Cardoso J, Moura B, Ferreira A, et al. Predictors of myocardial dysfunction in human immunodeficiency virus-infected patients. J Card Fail 1998;4:19-26. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Ogunmodede JA, Kolo PM, Katibi IA, et al. Structural echocardiographic abnormalities seen in HIV/AIDS patients are independent of cd4 count. Niger J Clin Pract 2017;20:716-23. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Morris A, Gingo MR, George MP, et al. Cardiopulmonary function in individuals with HIV infection in the antiretroviral therapy era. AIDS 2012;26:731-40. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Sani MU. Myocardial disease in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection: a review. Wien Klin Wochenschr 2008;120:77-87. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Santamore WP, Dell'Italia LJ. Ventricular interdependence: significant left ventricular contributions to right ventricular systolic function. Prog Cardiovasc Dis 1998;40:289-308. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Savvoulidis P, Butler J, Kalogeropoulos A. Cardiomyopathy and Heart Failure in Patients With HIV Infection. Can J Cardiol 2019;35:299-309. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Alvi RM, Neilan AM, Tariq N, et al. Protease Inhibitors and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients With HIV and Heart Failure. J Am Coll Cardiol 2018;72:518-30. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Robbertse PS, Doubell AF, Steyn J, et al. Altered cardiac structure and function in newly diagnosed people living with HIV: a prospective cardiovascular magnetic resonance study after the initiation of antiretroviral treatment. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 2023;39:169-82. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Nada T, Fukuda N, Yamaguchi Y, et al. Age-related changes in cardiac performance index (TEI index) with special reference to the difference between the ventricles. J Cardiol 2007;49:337-44. [PubMed]
- Sanders JL, Koestenberger M, Rosenkranz S, et al. Right ventricular dysfunction and long-term risk of death. Cardiovasc Diagn Ther 2020;10:1646-58. [Crossref] [PubMed]