A robust endothelial injury model inducing medial arterial calcification in C57BL/6J mice on a standard diet
Editorial

A robust endothelial injury model inducing medial arterial calcification in C57BL/6J mice on a standard diet

David Magne ORCID logo

Pathophysiology, Diagnosis and Treatments of Musculoskeletal Disorders (LYOS), INSERM, UMR 1033, University Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Lyon, France

Correspondence to: David Magne, PhD. Pathophysiology, Diagnosis and Treatments of Musculoskeletal Disorders (LYOS), INSERM, UMR 1033, University Claude Bernard Lyon 1, UFR Médecine Lyon-Est, 7, rue Guillaume Paradin, 69372 Lyon cedex 08, France. Email: david.magne@inserm.fr.

Comment on: Hu C, Wang Y, Zhang H, et al. Establishment of a medial arterial calcification model in C57BL/6J mice via arterial intimal injury. Cardiovasc Diagn Ther 2025;15:1092-106.


Keywords: Medial arterial calcification (MAC); mouse model; arterial intimal injury


Submitted Nov 21, 2025. Accepted for publication Jan 27, 2026. Published online Apr 21, 2026.

doi: 10.21037/cdt-2025-1-613


Arterial calcification is an age-associated process that develops in association with atherosclerosis, type 2 diabetes and chronic kidney disease (CKD). Arterial calcification can affect the intimal and/or medial layers of large arteries. Intimal calcification is associated with atherosclerosis, a condition that affects virtually all adults; it is the most common and the most extensively studied form of arterial calcification (1). In atherosclerotic plaques, the earliest microcalcifications can already be observed in early plaques, likely arising within necrotic cellular debris, and subsequently expand into larger calcified deposits that can occupy a substantial portion of the plaque volume (2). Calcifications in human plaques can present with different morphologies, ranging from microcalcifications, to sheet-like calcifications, nodular calcifications and, in relatively rare cases, osteoid metaplasia (3). All of these calcification morphologies are associated with dysregulated expression of osteoblast differentiation markers and/or calcification inhibitors (4).

Despite the large body of clinical data available, the impact of plaque calcification on plaque stability remains poorly understood and, in fact, somewhat controversial (1). Medial arterial calcification (MAC) begins in the third decade of life and increases in prevalence to affect the majority of individuals over the age of 65 years (5). MAC is further exacerbated in two common and often comorbid age-related diseases: CKD and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Histologically, MAC typically originates as microcalcifications located near the internal elastic lamina (6). It appears to progress through areas of cartilage metaplasia, characterized by chondrocyte-like cells and expression of chondrocyte markers (7,8). In advanced MAC, up to two-thirds of the medial layer may be calcified, with occasionally presence of bone structures (6). MAC is believed to impair arterial function and adversely affect cardiovascular morbidity and mortality (5,9,10).

Since the early 2000s, an increasing number of laboratories have established animal models to investigate the pathophysiological mechanisms underlying arterial calcification and to evaluate the effects of potential therapeutic interventions. Among the available experimental species (including rodents, pigs, and non-human primates), mice remain by far the most widely used due to their ease of manipulation and the extensive range of genetic models they provide. Nonetheless, while relatively robust models of intimal calcification have been developed in mice, medial calcification is more challenging to induce and is strongly influenced by both the mouse strain and the specific disease-inducing protocol.

Although imperfect, mouse models of intimal calcification have been available for many years and are now well characterized. Apolipoprotein E-deficient (ApoE-KO) mice represent the most widely used model, as ApoE deficiency induces atherosclerosis that recapitulates most key features of the human disease (11,12). As in human plaques (13), calcification is observed in virtually all atherosclerotic lesions in ApoE-KO mice (14). However, plaque calcification in these mice differs in important ways from that in humans. In ApoE-deficient mice, calcification develops through a process resembling endochondral ossification, characterized by the formation and subsequent mineralization of cartilaginous metaplasia (14,15). In contrast, ossification is less common in human plaques, and when present it more closely resembles intramembranous ossification, in which osteoblasts mineralize the tissue without a chondrocytic intermediate (2). Whether such species-specific differences in ossification pathways contribute to the much higher incidence of plaque rupture in humans compared with mice remains speculative, but it is an intriguing possibility that warrants further investigation (11,12).

In contrast to the intimal calcification of atherosclerotic plaques—which can be studied using several well-established mouse models (14-16)—MAC is more difficult to induce in mice, and the feasibility largely depends on whether MAC is associated with CKD, T2DM, or aging. For CKD-related MAC, two principal mouse models are commonly used (17). The first is adenine supplementation, which induces CKD (18) and triggers extensive MAC in C57BL/6 mice, accompanied by bone-like tissue formation, with no evidence of cartilage differentiation (19). The second model, 5/6 nephrectomy, also mimics human CKD, but it does not reliably induce MAC—particularly in the C57BL/6 strain, where medial calcification is modest and often entirely absent in some mice (20-22). One way to increase the severity of MAC after nephrectomy is to use mice on the DBA/2 background (23). In nephrectomized DBA/2 mice, as in C57BL/6 mice fed adenine, MAC appears to depend on osteoblast-like rather than chondrocyte-like differentiation (23). The DBA/2 strain allows the use of nephrectomy to induce MAC instead of the more aggressive adenine protocol, but switching to this background may require several generations of backcrossing when working with genetically modified mice originally produced on the C57BL/6 background (24). The greater susceptibility of DBA/2 mice to MAC compared with C57BL/6 mice is attributed to lower circulating levels of the mineralization inhibitors inorganic pyrophosphate and magnesium, resulting respectively from a hypomorphic mutation in the Abcc6 gene and from impaired regulation of the Trpm6 magnesium transporter (25). Another strategy to induce MAC in nephrectomized C57BL/6 mice is to use ApoE-deficient animals (26). However, nephrectomy in ApoE-KO mice amplifies intimal plaque calcification and induces MAC both at atherosclerotic intimal sites and at medial regions free of atheroma (26), which complicates the analysis and quantification of medial calcification specifically. In summary, investigators studying CKD-associated MAC have several options, including adenine supplementation in C57BL/6 mice or 5/6 nephrectomy in DBA/2 mice. Unfortunately, fewer models are available for studying MAC associated with T2DM or aging. One model of arterial calcification associated with T2DM is the low-density lipoprotein receptor-deficient (Ldlr-KO) mouse. However, when fed a high-fat diet, these mice develop both intimal calcification within atherosclerotic plaques and medial calcification (27,28), which complicates the specific quantification of medial calcification. Finally, to our knowledge, no mouse model exists that develops MAC specifically as a consequence of aging. Although MAC does occur in several genetic mouse models—such as matrix Gla protein–deficient mice (29) or transgenic mice overexpressing alkaline phosphatase in vascular smooth muscle cells (30)—these models, by definition, exhibit a constitutive dysregulation of calcification pathways.

In a recently published study (31), Hu et al. used an established model of endothelial regeneration—the mouse carotid artery wire-injury model (32)—and adapted it to develop a reliable model of MAC. Notably, this model was created in the C57BL/6 background, which is, as mentioned above, a strain known to be relatively resistant to ectopic calcification (25), and it did not require a high-fat or diabetogenic diet. In two-month-old male mice, the carotid arteries were surgically exposed under anesthesia. The left common and internal carotid arteries were temporarily occluded, and the external carotid artery (ECA) was ligated. A small incision was then made in the ECA with microscissors, and endothelial injury was induced using a stainless-steel wire. Sham-operated mice underwent the same procedure except for the mechanical wire injury. Three months later, mice subjected to mechanical injury—but not sham controls—developed medial calcification accompanied by chondroid and bone metaplasia, together with increased expression of Runt-related transcription factor 2 (RUNX2), the transcription factor that drives the differentiation of mineralizing hypertrophic chondrocytes and osteoblasts. This is an important finding since MAC in humans has also been reported to involve chondrocyte-like differentiation, a feature that appears absent in MAC induced in adenine-fed C57BL/6 mice (19) and in nephrectomized DBA/2 mice (23). This new surgical model may therefore represent a unique system for investigating chondrocyte differentiation in the context of MAC.

The fact that MAC is induced by endothelial injury, and not by CKD, T2DM or aging, may appear as a negative point, but it may not be without interest. Indeed, endothelial injury and internal elastic lamina disruption appear as important risk factors for the progression of vascular calcification in CKD patients (33,34). Moreover, in patients with T2DM, endothelial injury is positively associated with the progression of coronary artery calcification, and with mortality (35). In aging patients, calcification of the intracranial carotid artery, which is more predictive of stroke risk than that of extracranial arteries (36), appears to be mostly unrelated to atherosclerosis but associated with internal elastic lamina (37). Several non-exclusive mechanisms have been hypothesized to explain how endothelial injury and/or internal lamina disruption may lead to MAC: induction of endothelial-to-mesenchymal transition, exacerbation of inflammatory stimulation of vascular smooth muscle cells, or calcification of elastin fragments (38-40). The model proposed by Hu et al. may therefore be useful for gaining insight into these mechanisms. In particular, it would be very interesting to determine to what extent endothelial injury also compromises the integrity of the internal elastic lamina, and whether this may contribute to medial calcification. Deeper histological studies will be important to address this question.

In addition, in this recent article (31), histological analyses revealed the presence of M1 macrophages and elevated levels of interleukin (IL)-1β and IL-6, suggesting that inflammation contributed to the development of MAC. This finding is particularly noteworthy, as inflammation is considered one of the major drivers of both intimal and medial calcification (38). By translating clinical classification criteria for vascular calcification, authors developed a histopathological grading system for mouse MAC, allowing them to measure the progression of MAC during time, from non-calcified media to grade IV MAC. Grades I to IV MAC were defined according to the maximum diameter of calcium particle aggregation, being between 0.5 and 40 µM for grade I (micro and punctate calcification), up to 100 µM for grade II (fragment calcification), up to 300 µM for grade III (sheet calcification), and more than 300 µM for grade IV. Importantly, when a 0.45-mm wire was used to induce endothelial injury, MAC developed in nearly 90% of mice after three months, with a majority of grades III and IV. Such a high incidence in C57BL/6 mice will facilitate the investigation of the pathophysiological mechanisms driving cartilage and bone formation within the arterial media, including studies using genetically modified mouse models. Beyond enabling mechanistic exploration, this model also provides a valuable platform for testing therapeutic interventions targeting MAC development. Hu et al. demonstrated that two established calcification inhibitors, etidronate and SNF472, significantly reduced calcium deposition in the carotid artery, further validating this model. Finally, if a 100% incidence of MAC is required, the authors showed that administration of vitamin D₃ can reliably achieve this outcome. On the other hand, if the aim is to explore the mechanisms underlying the initiation of calcification, sacrificing mice one month or two months after surgery, when respectively 80% or 50% of arteries remain uncalcified (31), should allow analysis of the molecular events preceding calcification onset. Finally, while endothelial injury can be performed in normal wild-type mice, as described by Hu et al., it could also be used in combination with diets and/or surgical procedures that induce diabetes and/or kidney disease. Indeed, although type 2 diabetes and CKD accelerate the development of MAC in humans, animal models of these diseases often fail to induce medial calcification. For instance, there is so far no good model of MAC induced by diabetogenic diets in mice, and as explained above, chronic insufficiency induced by nephrectomy in C57BL/6 mice only occasionally induces medial calcification. In this context, using this endothelial injury approach in mice with diabetes or renal insufficiency may constitute an interesting way to study the impact of diabetes or renal disease on MAC.

In conclusion, Hu et al. developed a compelling mouse model of MAC on the relatively calcification-resistant C57BL/6 background, achieving nearly 100% incidence of arterial calcification without the need for high-fat or diabetogenic diets, or vitamin D₃ administration. This model is however not without limitations. First, all experiments were conducted with male mice, and it will be important to determine whether female mice calcify their vascular media to the same extent. In addition, the surgical procedure may be technically demanding and may not be easily implemented or rapidly mastered with high reproducibility across laboratories. Furthermore, MAC in this model is induced by mechanical injury, and differs fundamentally from the complex mechanisms driving MAC in T2DM, CKD, or aging. Nonetheless, in the absence of robust models of MAC—particularly for T2DM- or aging-associated calcification—this approach may still prove valuable.


Acknowledgments

None.


Footnote

Provenance and Peer Review: This article was commissioned by the editorial office, Cardiovascular Diagnosis and Therapy. The article has undergone external peer review.

Peer Review File: Available at https://cdt.amegroups.com/article/view/10.21037/cdt-2025-1-613/prf

Funding: None.

Conflicts of Interest: The author has completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form (available at https://cdt.amegroups.com/article/view/10.21037/cdt-2025-1-613/coif). The author has no conflicts of interest to declare.

Ethical Statement: The author is accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved.

Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.


References

  1. Onnis C, Virmani R, Kawai K, et al. Coronary Artery Calcification: Current Concepts and Clinical Implications. Circulation 2024;149:251-66. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  2. Jinnouchi H, Sato Y, Sakamoto A, et al. Calcium deposition within coronary atherosclerotic lesion: Implications for plaque stability. Atherosclerosis 2020;306:85-95. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  3. Morris MC, Kreutz RP. Coronary Calcification: Types, Morphology and Distribution. Interv Cardiol 2025;20:e13. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  4. Elmarasi M, Elmakaty I, Elsayed B, et al. Phenotypic switching of vascular smooth muscle cells in atherosclerosis, hypertension, and aortic dissection. J Cell Physiol 2024;239:e31200. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  5. Everhart JE, Pettitt DJ, Knowler WC, et al. Medial arterial calcification and its association with mortality and complications of diabetes. Diabetologia 1988;31:16-23. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  6. Lanzer P, Schurgers L, Twarda-Clapa A, et al. Medial arterial calcification in ageing and disease: current evidence and knowledge gaps. Eur Heart J 2025;46:4876-900. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  7. Shanahan CM, Cary NR, Salisbury JR, et al. Medial localization of mineralization-regulating proteins in association with Mönckeberg’s sclerosis: evidence for smooth muscle cell-mediated vascular calcification. Circulation 1999;100:2168-76. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  8. Qiao JH, Mertens RB, Fishbein MC, et al. Cartilaginous metaplasia in calcified diabetic peripheral vascular disease: morphologic evidence of enchondral ossification. Hum Pathol 2003;34:402-7. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  9. Niskanen L, Siitonen O, Suhonen M, et al. Medial artery calcification predicts cardiovascular mortality in patients with NIDDM. Diabetes Care 1994;17:1252-6. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  10. Lehto S, Niskanen L, Suhonen M, et al. Medial artery calcification. A neglected harbinger of cardiovascular complications in non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 1996;16:978-83. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  11. Zaragoza C, Gomez-Guerrero C, Martin-Ventura JL, et al. Animal models of cardiovascular diseases. J Biomed Biotechnol 2011;2011:497841. [PubMed]
  12. Vasquez EC, Peotta VA, Gava AL, et al. Cardiac and vascular phenotypes in the apolipoprotein E-deficient mouse. J Biomed Sci 2012;19:22. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  13. Doherty TM, Fitzpatrick LA, Inoue D, et al. Molecular, endocrine, and genetic mechanisms of arterial calcification. Endocr Rev 2004;25:629-72. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  14. Rattazzi M, Bennett BJ, Bea F, et al. Calcification of advanced atherosclerotic lesions in the innominate arteries of ApoE-deficient mice: potential role of chondrocyte-like cells. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2005;25:1420-5. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  15. Qiao JH, Fishbein MC, Demer LL, et al. Genetic determination of cartilaginous metaplasia in mouse aorta. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 1995;15:2265-72. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  16. Awan Z, Denis M, Bailey D, et al. The LDLR deficient mouse as a model for aortic calcification and quantification by micro-computed tomography. Atherosclerosis 2011;219:455-62. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  17. Lair B, Lac M, Frassin L, et al. Common mouse models of chronic kidney disease are not associated with cachexia. Commun Biol 2024;7:346. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  18. Yang Q, Su S, Luo N, et al. Adenine-induced animal model of chronic kidney disease: current applications and future perspectives. Ren Fail 2024;46:2336128. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  19. Tani T, Orimo H, Shimizu A, et al. Development of a novel chronic kidney disease mouse model to evaluate the progression of hyperphosphatemia and associated mineral bone disease. Sci Rep 2017;7:2233. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  20. Jin X, Rong S, Yuan W, et al. High Mobility Group Box 1 Promotes Aortic Calcification in Chronic Kidney Disease via the Wnt/β-Catenin Pathway. Front Physiol 2018;9:665. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  21. Kaesler N, Verhulst A, De Maré A, et al. Sclerostin deficiency modifies the development of CKD-MBD in mice. Bone 2018;107:115-23. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  22. Lin X, Xu F, Cui RR, et al. Arterial Calcification Is Regulated Via an miR-204/DNMT3a Regulatory Circuit Both In Vitro and in Female Mice. Endocrinology 2018;159:2905-16. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  23. El-Abbadi MM, Pai AS, Leaf EM, et al. Phosphate feeding induces arterial medial calcification in uremic mice: role of serum phosphorus, fibroblast growth factor-23, and osteopontin. Kidney Int 2009;75:1297-307. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  24. Yamada S, Leaf EM, Chia JJ, et al. PiT-2, a type III sodium-dependent phosphate transporter, protects against vascular calcification in mice with chronic kidney disease fed a high-phosphate diet. Kidney Int 2018;94:716-27. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  25. Babler A, Schmitz C, Buescher A, et al. Microvasculopathy and soft tissue calcification in mice are governed by fetuin-A, magnesium and pyrophosphate. PLoS One 2020;15:e0228938. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  26. Massy ZA, Ivanovski O, Nguyen-Khoa T, et al. Uremia accelerates both atherosclerosis and arterial calcification in apolipoprotein E knockout mice. J Am Soc Nephrol 2005;16:109-16. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  27. Naik V, Leaf EM, Hu JH, et al. Sources of cells that contribute to atherosclerotic intimal calcification: an in vivo genetic fate mapping study. Cardiovasc Res 2012;94:545-54. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  28. Nguyen N, Naik V, Speer MY. Diabetes mellitus accelerates cartilaginous metaplasia and calcification in atherosclerotic vessels of LDLr mutant mice. Cardiovasc Pathol 2013;22:167-75. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  29. Bak K, Parashar A, Allgayer R, et al. An inducible model for medial calcification based on matrix Gla protein deficiency. J Struct Biol 2024;216:108144. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  30. Sheen CR, Kuss P, Narisawa S, et al. Pathophysiological role of vascular smooth muscle alkaline phosphatase in medial artery calcification. J Bone Miner Res 2015;30:824-36. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  31. Hu C, Wang Y, Zhang H, et al. Establishment of a medial arterial calcification model in C57BL/6J mice via arterial intimal injury. Cardiovasc Diagn Ther 2025;15:1092-106. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  32. Nam D, Ni CW, Rezvan A, et al. Partial carotid ligation is a model of acutely induced disturbed flow, leading to rapid endothelial dysfunction and atherosclerosis. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 2009;297:H1535-43. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  33. Chang JF, Liu SH, Lu KC, et al. Uremic Vascular Calcification Is Correlated With Oxidative Elastic Lamina Injury, Contractile Smooth Muscle Cell Loss, Osteogenesis, and Apoptosis: The Human Pathobiological Evidence. Front Med (Lausanne) 2020;7:78. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  34. Yao DD, Yan XW, Zhou Y, et al. Endothelial injury is one of the risk factors for the progression of vascular calcification in patients receiving maintenance dialysis. Ren Fail 2025;47:2456690. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  35. von Scholten BJ, Reinhard H, Hansen TW, et al. Markers of inflammation and endothelial dysfunction are associated with incident cardiovascular disease, all-cause mortality, and progression of coronary calcification in type 2 diabetic patients with microalbuminuria. J Diabetes Complications 2016;30:248-55. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  36. Bos D, Portegies ML, van der Lugt A, et al. Intracranial carotid artery atherosclerosis and the risk of stroke in whites: the Rotterdam Study. JAMA Neurol 2014;71:405-11. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  37. Vos A, Van Hecke W, Spliet WG, et al. Predominance of Nonatherosclerotic Internal Elastic Lamina Calcification in the Intracranial Internal Carotid Artery. Stroke 2016;47:221-3. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  38. Bessueille L, Magne D. Inflammation: a culprit for vascular calcification in atherosclerosis and diabetes. Cell Mol Life Sci 2015;72:2475-89. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  39. Zhang L, Yao J, Yao Y, et al. Contributions of the Endothelium to Vascular Calcification. Front Cell Dev Biol 2021;9:620882. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  40. Lofaro FD, Mazzilli A, Bonacorsi S, et al. Calcification of the elastic component: the impact on the cardiovascular system. Front Cardiovasc Med 2025;12:1636812. [Crossref] [PubMed]
Cite this article as: Magne D. A robust endothelial injury model inducing medial arterial calcification in C57BL/6J mice on a standard diet. Cardiovasc Diagn Ther 2026;16(2):15. doi: 10.21037/cdt-2025-1-613

Download Citation