Erratum to Fragmented QRS on surface electrocardiogram is not a reliable predictor of myocardial scar, angiographic coronary disease or long term adverse outcomes

Erratum to: Cardiovasc Diagn Ther 2014;4:279-86

“Fragmented QRS on surface electrocardiogram is not a reliable predictor of myocardial scar, angiographic coronary disease or long term adverse outcomes” Cardiovasc Diagn Ther (1) 2014;4:279-286 edited by Dee Dee Wang¹, Amit Tibrewala², Phuc Nguygen¹, Tanmay Swadia¹, Gordon Jacobsen¹, Arfaat Khan¹, Karthik Ananthasubramaniam¹

Correspondence to: Karthik Ananthasubramaniam, MD, FACC, FASE, FASNC, FRCP (Glas). Henry Ford Hospital, Heart and Vascular Institute, 2799 West Grand Blvd, K-14, Detroit, MI 48202, USA. Email: kananth1@hfhs.org.

The paper was published with an error in the name of one of the researcher, co-author of this paper: Phuc Nguyen, and not Phuc Nguygen.

The correct name is as below:

Fragmented QRS on surface electrocardiogram is not a reliable predictor of myocardial scar, angiographic coronary disease or long term adverse outcomes

Dee Dee Wang¹, Amit Tibrewala², Phuc Nguyen¹, Tanmay Swadia¹, Gordon Jacobsen¹, Arfaat Khan¹, Karthik Ananthasubramaniam¹

¹Henry Ford Heart and Vascular Institute; ²Cardiovascular Physicians of North Atlanta

References

1. Wang DD, Tibrewala A, Nguyen P, et al. Fragmented QRS on surface electrocardiogram is not a reliable predictor of myocardial scar, angiographic coronary disease or long term adverse outcomes. Cardiovasc Diagn Ther 2014;4:279-86. [PubMed]